The Resource I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. : Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act., L.L. Boone and Oscar Trippet, attorneys for the plaintiff. Titus & Shaw, attorneys for defendant

I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. : Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act., L.L. Boone and Oscar Trippet, attorneys for the plaintiff. Titus & Shaw, attorneys for defendant

Label
I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. : Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act.
Title
I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant.
Title remainder
Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act.
Statement of responsibility
L.L. Boone and Oscar Trippet, attorneys for the plaintiff. Titus & Shaw, attorneys for defendant
Creator
Contributor
Defendant
Plaintiff
Subject
Language
eng
Related
Cataloging source
CLU
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
dictionaries
http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/organizationName
California
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorDate
1853-1926
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • Goldtree, I.
  • Spreckels, John Diedrich
  • Torrance, E. S
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Taxation
  • Tax assessment
  • Municipal bonds
  • Streets
Label
I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. : Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act., L.L. Boone and Oscar Trippet, attorneys for the plaintiff. Titus & Shaw, attorneys for defendant
Link
Instantiates
Publication
Note
  • Cover-title
  • At head of title: In the Superior Court of San Diego County, State of California
Extent
1 online resource ([3]-58 pages)
Form of item
online
Specific material designation
remote
Label
I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. : Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act., L.L. Boone and Oscar Trippet, attorneys for the plaintiff. Titus & Shaw, attorneys for defendant
Link
Publication
Note
  • Cover-title
  • At head of title: In the Superior Court of San Diego County, State of California
Extent
1 online resource ([3]-58 pages)
Form of item
online
Specific material designation
remote

Library Locations

  • Internet ArchiveBorrow it
    300 Funston Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94118, US
    37.7823215 -122.4716373

Library Links

Processing Feedback ...