Borrow it
Coverart for item
The Resource A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions, Scott A. Hayward

A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions, Scott A. Hayward

Creator
Contributor
Summary
The execution of contractual agreements between two private parties is generally limited to the good faith enforcement of expressed contract rights and implied rights established by common law. However, a multitude of rules significantly affect the rights and responsibilities of all parties to a contract when one of those parties is the Government. Not only do these rules dictate the content of Government contract provisions, but they affect the application of common law in determining implied rights and responsibilities and the method of the Government's administration of the contract. This paper will strive to illustrate both the differences and similarities between private and military construction contracting. It will then more specifically compare important clauses in the U.S. Navy's General Provisions for construction contracts and the American Institute of Architects' most important construction contract document, the A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. The two contract documents' assignment of rights and responsibilities to the owner, the contractor, and the architect, who is often a third party to the construction contract, will be discussed and evaluated. The goal will be for the reader to become more aware of opportunities and pitfalls for each party in relation to specific clauses, and to gain an appreciation for the difficulties experienced by contractors transitioning between private and military construction contracting
Language
eng
Work
Publication
Extent
1 online resource (ii, 100 pages)
Note
  • "Fall 1992."
  • Description based on title screen as viewed on February 8, 2010
  • DTIC Descriptor(s): Requirements, Department Of Defense, Corporations, Contract Administration, Federal Law, Navy, Construction, Military Forces(United States), Commercial Law, Architects, Theses, Military Procurement, Negotiations, Litigation, Regulations, Contracts
  • DTIC Identifier(s): Private Contracting, Military Contracting, Navy Contracting, AIA(American Institute Of Architects), FAR(Federal Acquisition Regulation), Far Clauses, Commercial Contracts, Government Contracts, Comparative Analysis
Link
Instance
Label
A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions
Title
A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions
Statement of responsibility
Scott A. Hayward
Creator
Contributor
Subject
Language
eng
Summary
The execution of contractual agreements between two private parties is generally limited to the good faith enforcement of expressed contract rights and implied rights established by common law. However, a multitude of rules significantly affect the rights and responsibilities of all parties to a contract when one of those parties is the Government. Not only do these rules dictate the content of Government contract provisions, but they affect the application of common law in determining implied rights and responsibilities and the method of the Government's administration of the contract. This paper will strive to illustrate both the differences and similarities between private and military construction contracting. It will then more specifically compare important clauses in the U.S. Navy's General Provisions for construction contracts and the American Institute of Architects' most important construction contract document, the A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. The two contract documents' assignment of rights and responsibilities to the owner, the contractor, and the architect, who is often a third party to the construction contract, will be discussed and evaluated. The goal will be for the reader to become more aware of opportunities and pitfalls for each party in relation to specific clauses, and to gain an appreciation for the difficulties experienced by contractors transitioning between private and military construction contracting
Additional physical form
Also available in print.
Cataloging source
AD#
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Hayward, Scott A
Dissertation note
Thesis (M.S. in Engineering)--University of Florida, 1992.
Funding information
FUNDED BY: N00123-89-G-0549
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
  • theses
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
University of Florida
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • American Institute of Architects
  • Public contracts
Label
A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions, Scott A. Hayward
Link
Instantiates
Publication
Note
  • "Fall 1992."
  • Description based on title screen as viewed on February 8, 2010
  • DTIC Descriptor(s): Requirements, Department Of Defense, Corporations, Contract Administration, Federal Law, Navy, Construction, Military Forces(United States), Commercial Law, Architects, Theses, Military Procurement, Negotiations, Litigation, Regulations, Contracts
  • DTIC Identifier(s): Private Contracting, Military Contracting, Navy Contracting, AIA(American Institute Of Architects), FAR(Federal Acquisition Regulation), Far Clauses, Commercial Contracts, Government Contracts, Comparative Analysis
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 100)
Extent
1 online resource (ii, 100 pages)
Form of item
online
Governing access note
"Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited."
Specific material designation
remote
System details
  • Mode of access: World Wide Web
  • System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Label
A comparison between the American Institute of Architects' and the United States Navy's construction contract general provisions, Scott A. Hayward
Link
Publication
Note
  • "Fall 1992."
  • Description based on title screen as viewed on February 8, 2010
  • DTIC Descriptor(s): Requirements, Department Of Defense, Corporations, Contract Administration, Federal Law, Navy, Construction, Military Forces(United States), Commercial Law, Architects, Theses, Military Procurement, Negotiations, Litigation, Regulations, Contracts
  • DTIC Identifier(s): Private Contracting, Military Contracting, Navy Contracting, AIA(American Institute Of Architects), FAR(Federal Acquisition Regulation), Far Clauses, Commercial Contracts, Government Contracts, Comparative Analysis
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 100)
Extent
1 online resource (ii, 100 pages)
Form of item
online
Governing access note
"Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited."
Specific material designation
remote
System details
  • Mode of access: World Wide Web
  • System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Subject

Library Locations

  • Internet ArchiveBorrow it
    300 Funston Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94118, US
    37.7823215 -122.4716373

Library Links

Zepheira Logo
Structured data from the Bibframe namespace is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License by Internet Archive - Open Library. Additional terms may apply to data associated with third party namespaces.
Processing Feedback ...